By Darryl Quantz, Specialty Registrar, Mersey Deanery, St Helen’s & Knowsley NHS Trust

It has now over a year since the Paris agreement which aimed to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change. Although this agreement was a positive step and has now been ratified by 172 countries (including the United Kingdom), public health must continue to take an increasing leadership role around environmental sustainability. This was the clear message at an event hosted by the All-Party Parliamentary Health Group and the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Climate Change.

The event brought together representatives from across sectors, including members of the Faculty of Public Health (FPH), to discuss the release of the Lancet Countdown report. The report tracks progress on health and climate change and highlights concern over the delayed response to climate change over the past 25 years. The panel discussed a wide range of public health opportunities for public health action including women’s rights around family planning, healthier agricultural policies and implementation of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

FPH has shown its commitment through the development of the Sustainable Development Special Interest Group and continuing to embed climate change/sustainability into the training of public health consultants. As individuals, you can consider your own personal opportunities to reduce your impact such as changing to a renewable energy provider, selecting a greener diet or choosing ethical/financial institutions for your banking. Professionally, it is important for us to consider the opportunities for environmental sustainability (and the positive health benefits!) throughout our practice. The FPH Sustainable Development Special Interest Group exists as a forum to promote and coordinate actions to support sustainable development. If you are interested in joining us, please contact the chair at jeremywight73@gmail.com

By Linda Hindle, Deputy Chief AHP Officer, Public Health England, and James Gore, Director of Education & Standards, Faculty of Public Health

Three years ago the Allied Health Professions (AHPs) agreed a collective ambition to be recognised as an integral part of the public health workforce. Since then AHPs have developed their public health contribution and profile, and there have been some excellent examples of AHP public health initiatives.

We want to support AHPs to share and celebrate some of the fantastic work happening already, which is why Public Health England (PHE) and the Faculty of Public Health (FPH) are delighted to be co-sponsoring the public health award at next year’s Advancing Healthcare Awards.

Previous winners have commented on the opportunities applying for this award has created in terms of profile and recognition.

In this blog we want to showcase winners from the past four years and encourage AHPs to consider applying for this prestigious award.

Previous winners have so far included occupational therapists, dietitians, physiotherapists and paramedics, but we have had applications from members of most of the AHPs.

In 2014 Mary Jardine and Allison Black from NHS Ayrshire and Arran won the award for their ‘whole system approach for women’ which was developed to divert women from the criminal justice and court systems with the aim of reducing offending behaviour and targeting the reasons for offending. This project showed clear outcomes in terms of health and re-offending and involved partnership-working between statutory and voluntary organisations across health, criminal justice, social and community organisations

Winners in 2015 were Lisa De’Ath and her team from the Family Food First Programme in Luton. This programme aims to encourage families with young children to adopt healthy lifestyles in order to reduce the burden of disease such as obesity and tooth decay. The team work in early years settings, such as nurseries, pre-schools and children centres, to promote and adopt healthy-eating messages. This is an example of AHPs using their unique skills and working through other partners to support population-level outcomes.

In 2016 Emma Holmes and Katie Palmer lifted the trophy. Emma and Katie are dietitians from Cardiff whose innovative project used food facilities during the school holidays to provide meals and educational play for children in need. The project involved working with more than 20 partners from the public, private and third sector. As well as addressing health problems, they provided affordable childcare to support families during school holidays.

Last year’s winner was Gillian Rawlinson, a physiotherapist from Salford Royal Hospitals NHS Trust, whose project embedded health promotion within musculoskeletal physiotherapy services. This collaborative service redesign incorporated opportunistic health assessments, NHS Health Check and diabetes checks within routine physiotherapy assessments. This resulted in a holistic service for patients, improved assessment and an income generating a financial model. Gillian has blogged about her experience of winning this award.

Ruth Crabtree and Tom Hayward from Yorkshire Ambulance Service were highly commended for their pathway to support ambulance service staff to identify, support and signpost people who would benefit from support to reduce their alcohol intake. This example demonstrated how a making-every-contact-count approach can be adopted in a systematic way across a full service.

We know there are many other excellent projects like these.

Applying for an award can take time, but this is generally time well spent regardless of whether the project wins. The process of making an application helps to raise the profile of the work internally and externally. It is also a useful in supporting reflection on what has been successful with the project and where it can go next.

This year we hope to profile all of the shortlisted applicants because we know it is not just the winners who have undertaken excellent pieces of work, and we want to use this as an opportunity to share good practice as much as possible.

So what are the judges looking for and how do you apply?

We will particularly be looking for examples of AHPs which have shown leadership and partnership in working to deliver effective health improvement interventions across a population or with the potential to be broadened to a population level – with evidence of impact, value for money and sustainability.

You have until 19 January 2018 to apply, so don’t put it off; start thinking about your application today.

By Gill Rawlinson, Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioner, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust 

Earlier this year I was proud to win the Advancing Healthcare FPH and PHE Award for contributions to public health for our innovative service which embedded NHS health checks and diabetes checks within NHS physiotherapy services in Salford.

The project, which was funded by Salford CCG’s innovation fund, allowed us to take a more focussed approach on embedding health promotion principles with the aim of supporting our patients with musculoskeletal problems to make positive lifestyle changes.

Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust provides physiotherapy services to some of the most deprived parts of England where health inequalities are large and health and lifestyle factors contribute greatly to ill health and premature mortality. From the initial project aims of creating a culture where patient’s health and lifestyle was central to their care, and where physiotherapists were encouraged to support behaviour change with individuals, the project quickly grew and partnerships developed with both public health at Salford City Council and the Salford National Diabetes Prevention Project (NDPP).

This allowed us to share our common goals and work collaboratively to deliver NHS health checks and diabetes check within routine physiotherapy appointments, the first service of its kind in England. This approach not only puts public health principles and prevention at the core of clinical assessment, but allows the opportunistic delivery of supportive interventions, such as motivational interviewing, at a time when patients are seeking help with a health problem and are often keen to make positive behaviour changes.

Helen Slee, Project Manager for the Salford NDPP, supported me to collect data which facilitated the identification of eligible patients and to collate a health profile of our patients. This data allows us to record our public health interventions and to evaluate our impact as a public health workforce. The project supports the Five Year Forward View NHS England strategy which challenges us all to put prevention at the heart of what we do and also illustrates the use of physiotherapists and wider Allied Health Professionals as an untapped public health workforce. Since the pilot project we have been supported by our Public Health team and Salford CCG to develop and scale up the project. We plan to evaluate the data further and publish the findings in the coming months.

Winning this award has allowed me opportunities to share and disseminate our project with many other organisations across the country.

It has also allowed me to meet many other people with a passion for public health who want to change things for the better, including leaders in AHP services and quality improvement. Most importantly it gave welcome appreciation and recognition to our many staff who embraced change and challenges to deliver an improved service, supporting our patients to live longer and healthier lives.
Why not think about entering for the award this year to share your great public health practice and celebrate your team’s successes? You never know where it may lead!

By Dr Lesley Graham, Associate Specialist, Public Health for Alcohol, Drugs and Health in Justice, ISD, National Services Scotland, and Faculty of Public Health Representative, SHAAP. Dr Harpreet S Kohli, Retired DPH, Co-opted Member, SHAAP.

The UK Supreme Court has  unanimously ruled that the Scottish Government’s legislation on Minimum Unit Pricing is legal. This is a landmark moment for public health and the end of a long journey. However, it also marks the start of a new journey to implement MUP to reduce alcohol-related harm in Scotland. When implemented this will mean that no alcohol can be sold in Scotland for less than 50p per unit.

Although the Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act 2012 was passed 5 years ago by the Scottish Parliament without opposition, global alcohol producers headed by the Scottish Whisky Association took the Scottish Government to court. There followed a lengthy and costly battle (in terms of lives lost, time, and money) all the way to the European Court of Justice and back to the highest court in the UK. This victory has been a huge collaborative effort from many players with public health at the heart of it.

Just over 10 years ago, an alcohol advocacy group, Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP) was set up and we were the Faculty of Public Health representatives. SHAAP was established due to concerns about the epidemic levels of alcohol harm in Scotland being driven by increasingly cheap alcohol.

Our report, Price Policy and Public Health was the first public call for action to introduce a minimum price for alcohol. The incoming SNP Scottish Government took up that call. As well as targeting the Scottish Parliament, SHAAP reached out to build alliances at global levels. By 2010, WHO (World Health Organisation) were recommending MUP as a policy ‘Best Buy’.

The broad scope of the role of public health has allowed us to contribute in a variety of ways, including:

  • Production of routine national statistics
  • Policy development
  • Advocacy
  • Research
  • Evaluation of the implementation of MUP in terms of what alcohol-related harm means for health boards in Scotland such as service provision

Here are some of our reflections of that journey

First, the importance of a sound evidence base. Although MUP had never been tried and tested before, we had based the rationale on the evidence of the relationship between price, consumption and harm. The more price falls, consumption rises and so does harm. That sound evidence base proved its worth in the sometimes stormy debate that was to follow.

Second, we had ‘reframed’ the problem with a public health paradigm, if average population consumption would fall, so would harm. This helped move the narrative away from being the problem of a minority of individuals or one of anti-social behaviour.

Thirdly, those from the most disadvantaged backgrounds experienced greater levels of alcohol related harm, indeed, those inequalities were widening. It was a matter of social justice. We had champions, both political and public health who went out and campaigned hard and did not give up.  Other countries now are poised to follow Scotland’s lead.

Lastly, we think it is more than about alcohol policy. It shows that public health can trump private profit and the alcohol industry. A great moment indeed!


The Chief Nursing Directorate at Public Health England (PHE) and the Florence Nightingale Foundation (FNF) are offering a bespoke scholarship a bespoke scholarship named after an inspirational public health nurse who sadly died in 2016.

The award is in memory of Nana Quawson, a dedicated school nurse and practice nurse who sadly passed away last year. Nana was passionate about improving the health and wellbeing of children and young people through evidence based public health interventions. She spent time with the Nursing Directorate in the Department of Health and Public Health England sharing her expertise, ideas and enhancing her public health leadership skills.

The FNF scholarship builds on Nana’s journey and aims to provide a fabulous opportunity for a public health nurse to enhance their leadership and become a strong leader with the skills and self-confidence to contribute positively and make a tangible difference to the outcomes for children, young people and families. As part of the scholarship we are delighted to also offer a work based placement within the Chief Nurse Directorate at PHE and work with the team on raising the profile of public health nursing, prevention and improving the health and wellbeing of children, young people and families.

This scholarship remembers the dedication, passion and drive of Nana Quawson (1972-2016), a valued colleague and school nurse. The scholarship provides the opportunity for other public health nurses to follow in Nana’s footsteps and make a difference to children, young people and families.

For further information please visit the FNF website. To find out more about our work at PHE please contact Wendy Nicholson or Penny Greenwood.


By Dr Samia Latif, member of the Global Violence Prevention special interest group at the Faculty of Public Health

Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria and Nigeria have something common between them other than being third world nations. They are the only remaining countries where polio, amongst other infectious but preventable diseases, still ravages and raids childhood and the dreams of an entire generation.

Vaccinations have been one of the single most effective public health interventions known to mankind but in order for a good immunisation programme to take root there needs to be a safe and stable environment to deliver the vaccinations alongside a good understanding of the political context in which these immunisation programmes operate. These countries have been in a state of conflict recently and as such, Polio triumphs along with other childhood infectious diseases.

Wars, insurgencies and conflict drive resources away from the basics such as health, education and societal structures. Ways of life are disrupted which is further compounded by forced migration, displaced populations and a breakdown of trust. It comes as no surprise then that polio’s final strongholds are some of the most complicated places in the world to deliver vaccination campaigns.

There is evidence that hostility to immunisation programmes may not necessarily be the result of insurgents’ theology, rather it arises from suspicion and mistrust. For example, in Nigeria, the last African country harbouring endemic polio, many believed that the vaccine contained anti-fertility drugs and cancer-causing viruses. Similar misconceptions were rife in Pakistan where the Taliban insurgents propagated rumours that led to the targeting and killing of healthcare workers delivering the vaccinations; such can be the indirect and uncalculated costs and victims of conflict! It did not help of course that America had used the immunisation programme as a cover up for its spying operations.

Trust is key to the acceptance and success of any public health intervention but more so for an immunisation programme that involves inoculating apparently healthy individuals with weakened strains of microbes or antibodies to the same.

Access to healthcare is a major determinant of health; war and conflict destroy the routes and health and social care structures to access so it is no wonder then that war and infectious diseases are such good comrades. Add to the picture of already exhausted and fragmented health and social care the genetic evolution of bacteria and viruses causing infectious diseases and you have a recipe for disaster that cooks for many years even after the conflict or war has ended. Lack of access to immunisation programmes, antimicrobial resistance and changing strains of microbes may have very long lasting effects that are witnessed by subsequent generations as herd immunity falls below optimal levels. Bosnia and Herzegovina being a case study in time where the recent measles outbreak was a consequence of the conflict 20 years ago.

In today’s global context, when borders are increasingly porous and diseases neither respect nor recognise these borders, the challenge posed by global conflict threatens the very premises on which our society’s foundations of health and social care have been laid. A clear example is the resurgence of polio in Iraq 14 years after being disease free due to spread from neighboring Syria.

A problem thousands of miles away does not mean it won’t come knocking on our doors soon. There needs to be a united call to arms by world leaders and all levels of society to advocate for peace, building trust and working with and through communities; something public health does best!

By John Middleton, FPH President

better mental health infographic

Mental health in the workplace is the theme for this year’s World Mental Health Day today. The workplace is a key setting for health as good work is a key determinant of health.

Job control, fair treatment, job security and reward for our efforts are what characterise good work. Those who lack autonomy to do their job, have insecure terms and conditions, are treated unfairly or receive no praise or recognition from their managers will feel their health suffer. This in turn will impact on productivity, staff retention and sickness absence.

Sadly, we too often see workplace mental health action focussed on individual behaviours rather than organisational actions that tackle these determinants of health at work. Workplace wellbeing has become extremely popular but yoga at lunchtimes may do little, if anything, to tackle the causes of stress.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance for workplace health recognises the organisational commitment needed, the role of good line management and the value of staff participation in decision-making. It also recommends the Health & Safety Executive’s excellent management standards for workplace stress. The public health workplace is not exempt. There are many stressors out of our control but there is also much that we can do. As well as implementing the NICE guidance or management standards we can also look out for one another. Relationships are key for good health and equally so at work.

Being aware of our own mental health and wellbeing is the start of taking any action. This helps us improve our communication with others and create meaningful solutions with others. The revised Faculty of Public Health (FPH) curricula 2015 included a new learning outcome that we could all do more to demonstrate and apply: an understanding of how mental health and wellbeing can be managed and promoted in staff and yourself in a range of situations.

Mental health remains a priority for FPH and for me personally. Last month I pledged FPH’s support by signing the Prevention Concordat for Better Mental Health that we have contributed to through our Public Mental Health Special Interest Group. We will continue to take action, to support our members in their practice and to advocate nationally for the public’s mental health.

As a standard-setter and educator, we will include positive mental health in our education and training programmes, and we will work to become a Mindful Employer.