- by Dr Anne Eyre
- Trauma Training
I recently met a Director of Public Health. We were both in the lunch queue at a conference which was focusing on civil contingencies, the needs of people in disasters and organisational structures for addressing local resilience.
As we queued I asked her about provision of psychological (trauma) support services in her area for addressing the needs of people in the event of a major emergency. She replied, somewhat curtly, that she did not know: it was not her responsibility she said; it was not her budget. I was told I obviously hadn’t read the Health and Social Care Act, 2012.
Somewhat bemused, I sought reassurance. Perhaps I had misunderstood; she was not suggesting that psychological support services are not to do with public health? Sadly, I did not get that reassurance.
Just to be clear I went away and re-read the Act, and also the Department of Health’s guidance on the roles and responsibilities of Directors of Public Health in Local Government. This says that, among other things, Directors of Public Health (DPH) should offer leadership, expertise and advice on a range of issues, from emergency preparedness through to improving local people’s health and concerns around access to health services.
With regard to health emergency, preparedness resilience and response (EPRR) the role of Local Authorities, via their DPH, is to:
- Provide leadership for the public health system within their local authority area;
- Take steps to ensure that plans are in place to protect the health of their populations, and
- Fulfill the responsibilities of a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act.
This is encapsulated in the Emergency Preparedness Framework 2013 (NHS Commissioning Board, 2013).
At a time of tight budgetary constraint, and pressures on all those working within our public services, keeping trauma support and other mental health services on the agenda remains a formidable challenge in ordinary time, let alone in the context of major emergencies and disasters.
Perhaps this helps to explain why psychological support services, and indeed broader aspects of humanitarian assistance, remain the poor relation when it comes to emergency planning, response and longer term recovery in so many areas of the country. But these are integral aspects of public health, and not just in the event of disasters.
It is a worrying thought that our sense of health responsibility could become limited only to those activities over which we have direct budgetary control. Directors of Public Health in particular have a key role to play in delivering real improvements in local health in today’s health system. They are corporately and professionally accountable; with such seniority comes responsibility.
The challenge and expectation on all those who lead on health-related initiatives before, during and after emergencies, is that they will think holistically about people, across phases of disaster, beyond rigid organisational structures and within a multiagency framework in responding to the needs of their communities. For a long time this idea has been encapsulated in the concept of integrated emergency management and it is integral to so many of our organisational philosophies today.
I think it is important that we never forget that public health is about people and that responding to disasters – before, during and after they strike – is about helping and supporting people, including through the provision of robust public mental health services. This is not to say it is easy, and not to acknowledge that addressing mental health and other needs in today’s world of limited budgets and organisational structures can be difficult. However the challenge to those in leadership positions, and indeed all of us, is to work with and through these, not be constrained by them.
The public and those we serve will help ground us in this. Try telling those affected by the recent floods, or any other disaster for that matter, that public health in emergencies is not to do with psychological support.
References
- Department of Health (2012) Directors of Public Health in Local Government – Roles, responsibilities and context. Crown Copyright, October 2012
- NHS Commissioning Board (2013) Emergency Preparedness Framework 2013, Leeds, March 2013
- H M Government (2012) Health and Social Care Act 2012, Crown copyright The Stationery Office
The blogger seems to be under the impression that a DPH and her dept can be all things to all people in any circumstance
This is obviously impossible
They are not resourced to
They done have the skills to
And whilst the Act may make reference to this, it is widely held that in respect of EP and H Protection especially the Act is a dogs breakfast. Confusion reigns as to who does what.
I completely agree with Dr Eyre’s views – public health has a pivotal role to play in disaster responses and having been directly flooded myself and involved in the incident response in three major incidents in Cumbria, one overwhelming need was to ensure the timely provision of psychosocial support to those who need it – whilst distress is extremely common following a major incident and many will recover through their own resilience, there is no doubt that many welcome access to good social and practical support which can protect against the negative psychosocial impacts of a disaster. I am not at all sure where prevailing views that mental health is not a core consideration in disaster responses comes from? Public health practitioners in LAs are responsible for delivering on public mental health services as well as their involvement in disaster planning. It is not good enough to say we don’t have the expertise nor do we have the resources – mental health is still seen as a cinderella specialty – we don’t need public health practitioners to reinforce this view – we need them to take hold of the mantle and work with appropriate colleagues and stakeholders in LAs, CCGs and the voluntary sector to deliver improved mental health outcomes which includes responding to major incidents.